Moderation in Proportional Systems: Coalitions Matter

Anouk Riviere

(2003)

Anouk Riviere (2003) Moderation in Proportional Systems: Coalitions Matter.

Our Full Text Deposits

Full text access: Open

dpe0307.pdf - 77.93 KB

Abstract

This paper examines the role of the coalition formation process in a proportional system. It models its impact on the voters (who maximize their expected utilities) and the parties (who choose their platforms in a Nash game). In contrast with the intuitive idea that proportional systems represent “proportionally”, I show that a proportional system with minimal range coalitions leads to party convergence towards the median of the political spectrum. Indeed, a political party’s prospects of power are better when it is more likely to find ideological partners, i.e. when it is not ideologically isolated. In contrast, if coalitions are formed according to a minimum winning coalition rule a la Riker, any policy can be implemented in equilibrium.

Information about this Version

This is a Accepted version
This version's date is: 2003
This item is peer reviewed

Link to this Version

https://repository.royalholloway.ac.uk/items/e7f790a2-a945-013c-fe4a-bf2e3e533c85/1/

Item TypeMonograph (Working Paper)
TitleModeration in Proportional Systems: Coalitions Matter
AuthorsRiviere, Anouk
Uncontrolled Keywordselectoral system, outcome simplex, strategic voting, pivot probability, positional equilibrium, minimal range coalition, minimal winning coalition, median voter theorem.
DepartmentsFaculty of History and Social Science\Economics

Deposited by Leanne Workman (UXYL007) on 24-Oct-2012 in Royal Holloway Research Online.Last modified on 24-Oct-2012

Notes

©2003 Anouk Riviere. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit including © notice, is given to the source.

References


Details