Are infants in the dark about hidden objects?

Shinskey, J and Munakata, Y

(2003)

Shinskey, J and Munakata, Y (2003) Are infants in the dark about hidden objects?. Developmental Science, 6 (3).

Our Full Text Deposits

Full text access: Open

Full Text - 340.97 KB

Links to Copies of this Item Held Elsewhere


Abstract

Infants appear to search for objects hidden by darkness earlier in development than they search for objects hidden by an occluder in the light. However, these two types of search tasks have differed in numerous ways that may have contributed to better performance in the dark (e.g. in whether the hidden objects made sound, in the number of familiarization trials with visible objects). The current studies controlled such incidental differences between search tasks, so that they could be directly compared. Six-and-a-half-month-olds received four types of test events, in which either a toy or no toy was presented and then hidden in the dark or under a cloth in the light. Infants searched more often on toy than no-toy trials in the dark than with a cloth. The advantage in searching for hidden objects in the dark thus appears to be genuine. Theoretical implications are discussed.

Information about this Version

This is a Published version
This version's date is: 06/2003
This item is not peer reviewed

Link to this Version

https://repository.royalholloway.ac.uk/items/9e9ea26a-c562-e585-6cef-35c66813dd68/1/

Item TypeJournal Article
TitleAre infants in the dark about hidden objects?
AuthorsShinskey, J
Munakata, Y
Uncontrolled Keywordsinfants’ object search, object permanence, reaching-in-the-dark, means-end, graded representations
DepartmentsFaculty of Science\Psychology

Identifiers

doi10.1111/1467-7687.00283

Deposited by () on 23-Dec-2009 in Royal Holloway Research Online.Last modified on 23-Dec-2009

Notes

The attached paper is the final draft version of the published paper.

References

Baillargeon, R., Graber, M., DeVos, J., & Black, J. (1990). Why do young infants fail to search for hidden objects?
Cognition, 36, 255-284.
Baillargeon, R., Spelke, E.S., & Wasserman, S. (1985). Object permanence in 5.5-month-old infants. Cognition, 20, 191-
208.
Bigelow, A. E. (1983). Development of the use of sound in the search behavior of infants. Developmental Psychology, 19,
317-321.
Bower, T.G.R., & Wishart, J.G. (1972). The effects of motor skill on object permanence. Cognition, 1, 165-172.
Clifton, R., Perris, E., & Bullinger, A. (1991). Infants' perception of auditory space. Developmental Psychology, 27, 187-
197.
Clifton, R.K., Perris, E.E., & McCall, D.D. (1999). Does reaching in the dark for unseen objects reflect representation in
infants? Infant Behavior and Development, 22, 297-302.
Clifton, R.K., Rochat, P., Litovsky, R.Y., Perris, E.E. (1991). Object representation guides infants' reaching in the dark.
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17, 323-329.
Corman, H.H. & Escalona, S. K. (1969). Stages of sensorimotor development: a replication study. Merrill-Palmer
Quarterly, 15, 351-361.
Diamond, A. (1991). Neuropsychological insights into the meaning of object concept development. In S. Carey & R.
Gelman (Eds.), The epigenesis of mind (pp. 67-110). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dunst, C.J., Brooks, P.H., & Doxsey, P.A. (1982). Characteristics of hiding places and the transition to Stage IV
performance in object permanence tasks. Developmental Psychology, 18, 671-681.
Freedman, D.A., Fox-Kolenda, B.J., Margileth, D.A., & Miller, D.H. (1969). The development of the use of sound as a
guide to affective and cognitive behavior – a two-phase process. Child Development, 40, 1099-1105.
Ginsburg, H.J. & Wong, D.L. (1973). Enhancement of hidden object search in six-month-old infants presented with a
continuously sounding hidden object. Developmental Psychology, 9, 142.
Goubet, N., & Clifton, R.K. (1998). Object and event representation in 6-and-a-half-month-old infants. Developmental
Psychology, 34, 63-76.
Gratch, G. (1972). A study of the relative dominance of vision and touch in six-month-old infants. Child Development, 43,
615-623.
Haith, M.M., & Campos, J.J. (1977). Human infancy. Annual Review of Psychology,28, 251-293.
Hillier, L., Hewitt, K.L., & Morongiello, B.A. (1992). Infants’ perception of illusions in sound localization: reaching to
sounds in the dark. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 53, 159-179.
Hood, B., & Willatts, P. (1986). Reaching in the dark to an object's remembered position: evidence for object permanence
in 5-month-old infants. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4, 57-65.
Jackson, E., Campos, J.J., & Fischer, K. W. (1978). The question of decalage between object permanence and person
permanence. Developmental Psychology, 14, 1-10.
LaGasse, L.L., VanVorst, R. F., Brunner, S.M., & Zucker, M.S. (1999). Infants’ understanding of auditory events. Infant
and Child Development, 8, 85-100.
Legerstee, M. (1994). The role of familiarity and sound in the development of person and object permanence. British
Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 455-468.
McCall, D.D., & Clifton, R.K. (1999). Infants' means-end search for hidden objects in the absence of visual feedback.
Infant Behavior and Development, 22, 179-195.
Miller, D.J., Cohen, L.B., & Hill, K.T. (1970). A methodological investigation of Piaget’s theory of object concept
development in the sensory-motor period. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 9, 59-85.
Munakata, Y. (1997). Perseverative reaching in infancy: the roles of hidden toys and motor history in the AB task. Infant
Behavior and Development, 20, 405-416.
Munakata, Y., McClelland, J.L., Johnson, M.H., & Siegler, R.S. (1997). Rethinking infant knowledge: toward an adaptive
process account of successes and failures in object permanence tasks. Psychological Review, 104, 686-713.
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.
Perris, E.E., & Clifton, R.K. (1988). Reaching in the dark toward sound as a measure of auditory localization in infants.
Infant Behavior and Development, 11, 473-491.
Rader, N., Spiro, D.J., & Firestone, P.B. (1979). Performance on a Stage IV object-permanence task with standard and
nonstandard covers. Child Development, 50, 908-910.
Shinskey, J.L., & Munakata, Y. (2001). Detecting transparent barriers: clear evidence against the means-end deficit
account of search failures. Infancy, 2, 395-404.
Smith, L.B., Thelen, E., Titzer, R., & McLin, D. (1999). Knowing in the context of action: the task dynamics of the A-not-
B error. Psychological Review, 106, 235-260.
Spelke, E.S., Breinlinger, K., Macomber, J. & Jacobson, K. (1992). Origins of knowledge. Psychological Review, 99, 605-
632.
Stack, D.S., Muir, D.W., Sheriff, F., & Roman, J. (1989). Development of infant reaching in the dark to luminous objects
and ‘invisible’ sounds. Perception, 18, 69-82.
Uzgiris, I.C. & Hunt, J. McV. (1975). Assessment in infancy: ordinal scales of psychological development. Chicago:
University of Illinois Press.
Willatts, P. (1984). Stages in the development of intentional search by young infants. Developmental Psychology, 20, 389-
396.
Willatts, P. (1999). Development of means-end behavior in young infants: pulling a support to retrieve a distant object.
Developmental Psychology, 35, 651-667.
Wishart, J.G., Bower, T.G.R., & Dunkeld, J. (1978). Reaching in the dark. Perception, 7, 507-512.
Wynn, K. (1992). Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature, 358, 749-750.


Details