Object permanence in five-and-a-half-month-old infants?

Shinskey, J L, Bogartz, R S and Schilling, T H

(2000)

Shinskey, J L, Bogartz, R S and Schilling, T H (2000) Object permanence in five-and-a-half-month-old infants?. Infancy, 1 (4).

Our Full Text Deposits

Full text access: Open

Full Text - 109.27 KB

Links to Copies of this Item Held Elsewhere


Abstract

Event Set x Event Set designs were used to study the rotating screen paradigm introduced by Baillargeon, Spelke, and Wasserman (1985). In Experiment 1, 36 5 1/2 month-old infants were habituated to a screen rotating up to 180 degrees up to and seemingly through a block. All infants were then tested on the same 3 events and also a screen rotating 120 degrees with no block. The results indicate that infants are using novelty and familiarity preference to determine their looking times. To confirm this, in Experiment 2, 52 5 1/2-month-old infants were familiarized on either 3 or 7 trials to a screen rotating 180 degrees with no block or a screen rotating 120 degrees with no block. All infants were then tested on the same test events as Experiment 1. Infants with fewer familiarization trials were more likely to prefer the familiar rotation event. The results of these 2 experiments indicate that infants did not use the possibility or impossibility of events but instead used familiarity or novelty relations between the habituation events and the test events to determine their looking times, and suggest that the Baillargeon et al study should not be interpreted as indicating object permanence or solidity knowledge in young infants.

Information about this Version

This is a Published version
This version's date is: 2000
This item is not peer reviewed

Link to this Version

https://repository.royalholloway.ac.uk/items/2311a455-f0fe-6428-1aa0-34d93e2a33eb/1/

Item TypeJournal Article
TitleObject permanence in five-and-a-half-month-old infants?
AuthorsShinskey, J L
Bogartz, R S
Schilling, T H
Uncontrolled Keywordsobject permanence, 5 1/2 year old infants, habituation, familiarization, novelty
DepartmentsFaculty of Science\Psychology

Identifiers

Deposited by () on 23-Dec-2009 in Royal Holloway Research Online.Last modified on 23-Dec-2009

Notes

This article was published in the journal 'Infancy'. All copyright is retained by the publisher Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.


Details