The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire change version (DTSQc) evaluated in insulin glargine trials shows greater responsiveness to improvements than the original DTSQ.

Bradley, Clare, Plowright, Rosalind, Stewart, J, Valentine, J and Witthaus, E

(2007)

Bradley, Clare, Plowright, Rosalind, Stewart, J, Valentine, J and Witthaus, E (2007) The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire change version (DTSQc) evaluated in insulin glargine trials shows greater responsiveness to improvements than the original DTSQ.. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5:57

Our Full Text Deposits

Full text access: Open

Full Text - 330.41 KB

Links to Copies of this Item Held Elsewhere




Abstract

The results of using status measures to identify any changes in treatment satisfaction strongly suggest a need for specific change instruments designed to overcome the ceiling effects frequently observed at baseline. Status measures may leave little room to show improvement in situations where baseline ceiling effects are observed. A change version of the DTSQ (DTSQc) is compared here with the original status (now called DTSQs) version to test the instruments' comparative ability to demonstrate change.

Methods
Two multinational, openlabel, randomised-controlled trials (one for patients with type 1 diabetes, the other for type 2) compared new, longer-acting insulin glargine with standard NPH basal insulin. The DTSQs was completed at baseline and the DTSQs and DTSQc at final visit by 351 English- and German-speaking patients. DTSQc scores were compared with change from baseline for the DTSQs, using 3-way analysis of variance, to examine Questionnaire, Treatment and Ceiling effects (i.e. baseline scores at/near ceiling).

Results and discussion
Significant Questionnaire effects and a Questionnaire × Ceiling interaction (p < 0.001) in both trial datasets showed that the DTSQc detected more improvement in Treatment Satisfaction than the DTSQs, especially when patients had DTSQs scores at/near ceiling at baseline. Additionally, significant Treatment effects favouring insulin glargine (p < 0.001) and a Treatment × Questionnaire interaction (p < 0.019), with the DTSQc showing more benefits, were found in the type 1 trial. Results for Perceived Hyper- and Hypoglycaemia also demonstrated important differences between the questionnaires in the detection of treatment effects. Tests of effect sizes showed these differences in response to change to be significantly in favour of the DTSQc.

Conclusion
The DTSQc, used in conjunction with the DTSQs, overcomes the problem of ceiling effects encountered when only the status measure is used and provides a means for new treatments to show greater value than is possible with the DTSQs alone.

Information about this Version

This is a Submitted version
This version's date is: 10/10/2007
This item is not peer reviewed

Link to this Version

https://repository.royalholloway.ac.uk/items/0dede910-6539-26a6-8ace-b16ad5a2d40c/3/

Item TypeJournal Article
TitleThe Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire change version (DTSQc) evaluated in insulin glargine trials shows greater responsiveness to improvements than the original DTSQ.
AuthorsBradley, Clare
Plowright, Rosalind
Stewart, J
Valentine, J
Witthaus, E
Uncontrolled KeywordsDTSQ, Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, insulin glargine, trials, evaluation
Departments

Identifiers

doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-57

Deposited by Research Information System (atira) on 30-May-2012 in Royal Holloway Research Online.Last modified on 30-May-2012

Notes

Article number 57


Details