Justin Champion (1999) Apocrypha, canon and criticism from Samuel Fisher to John Toland, 1650-1718 In: Judaeo-Christian intellectual culture in the seventeenth century: a celebration of the library of Narcissus Marsh, (1638-1713). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Full text access: Open
Bishop Stillingfleet took the authority of canonical scripture as the foundation of the protestant case. Radical critics, in particular Samuel Fisher and John Toland, undermined this by pointing to the different versions of the canonical texts, the disputes about the canon, and the existence of apocryphal texts which might have been included.
This is a Published version This version's date is: 06/1999 This item is peer reviewed
https://repository.royalholloway.ac.uk/items/129fbd32-4947-b299-276e-4525ad845f19/1/
Deposited by () on 23-Dec-2009 in Royal Holloway Research Online.Last modified on 21-May-2010