Accounting at the London School of Economics: Opportunity Lost?


(2009) Accounting at the London School of Economics: Opportunity Lost?.

Our Full Text Deposits

Full text access: Open


Given the aims of the founders of the London School of Economics, it is not surprising that accounting should have been taught at the School from soon after its establishment. An early focus on teaching practical accounting, with professional practitioners as teachers, was gradually supplanted by approaches informed by the economics of decision-making in conditions of scarce resources. By the 1930s, the Department of Business Administration provided an intellectual basis for thinking about financial reporting and costing that challenged taken-for-granted practices. After World War II, the “LSE Triumvirate” of William Baxter, Harold Edey and David Solomons took forward ideas of opportunity cost and value to the owner as core theoretical concepts, while developing undergraduate and later postgraduate programmes that provided rigorous education for future accountants, administrators, business people and academics. However, by the late 1960s, the Department of Accounting missed the opportunity of responding to changes in research focus in North America, which were influenced by developments in financial economics. The outcome was an erosion of research leadership, with other UK universities becoming the main centres of quantitative and critical accounting research.

Information about this Version

This is a Submitted version
This version's date is: 04/11/2009
This item is peer reviewed

Link to this Version

Item TypeMonograph (Working Paper)
TitleAccounting at the London School of Economics: Opportunity Lost?
Uncontrolled KeywordsAccounting ideas; value to the owner; opportunity cost; economics of accounting; accounting education
DepartmentsFaculty of History and Social Science\Management

Deposited by () on 17-Feb-2010 in Royal Holloway Research Online.Last modified on 17-Feb-2010